🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a recent study carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited radical parties by legitimising their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six national publications.

Capital-based researchers noted that as the radical faction shifted from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and migration, established political groups progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to the electorate that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by mainstream political groups plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior participating in the study.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when mainstream groups were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Across Europe

While the research was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to affect nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for one week."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he added.

Hardening of Public Discourse

At times, political figures have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor advocated widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed across the continent, as politicians from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to France adopt the language of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an echo chamber that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist party and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Other parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the far right, even as research suggests that doing so leads the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information collected revealed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a co-author. "However, when you encounter this negative framing around migration frequently, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The research highlighted the necessity for established parties to carve out their distinct narratives, especially on topics such as immigration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be playing."